Labels

Evolution (13) DNA (6) Bible prophecies (5) Blood Moon (4) prophecies (4) Blind faith (3) Book of Daniel (3) Eve (3) God (3) God's fingerprints (3) Intelligent Design (3) Only way (3) Star of Bethlehem (3) Trinity (3) mtDNA (3) origin of life (3) Adam & Eve (2) Allah (2) Analogy of Trinity (2) Ashley Madison (2) Bible reliability (2) Common Ancestor (2) Exodus (2) Hawking (2) Herod (2) Islam (2) Jericho dispute (2) Jesus (2) Moses (2) Muslims. (2) Nicky Cruz (2) Pharaohs (2) Plagues (2) RNA (2) Torah (2) atheism (2) fun story (2) genocide (2) iron teeth monster (2) leap of faith (2) magi (2) rationality (2) science & faith (2) science updates (2) serpent (2) skeptics (2) sufferings (2) truth (2) virgin birth (2) AI (1) Abraham's test. 自導自演 (1) Acts (1) Adam (1) Andrew Chan (1) Ape DNA (1) Armageddon Book of Joel (1) Astrology (1) Astronomy (1) Atheists (1) Ave Maria (1) Balaam (1) Baphomet (1) Beheadings (1) Bethlehem babies (1) Bethlehem star (1) Bible (1) Bible & Phi (1) Bible & Science (1) Bible scurtiny (1) Big Bang (1) Book of Luke (1) Bryant Wood (1) Buddhism (1) Canaan Conquest. (1) Carbon 14 tests (1) Constantine (1) Council of Nicaea (1) Da Vinci Code (1) Dan Brown (1) David Wood (1) Dead Sea Scrolls (1) Doom sayings (1) Evolution,Darwinism (1) Fibonacci number (1) Forgiveness (1) Garden of Eden (1) Genome comparison (1) Goat statue (1) God delusion (1) God is cruel? (1) God's glory (1) God's grace (1) God/man dual nature (1) Golden Angels Choir (1) Golden ratio (1) Gravity Wave (1) He will carry you. 4 You tube songs (1) Holocaust (1) Hominid Hype (1) Homo Naledi (1) ISIS (1) Information (1) Isaiah 53 (1) Jericho (1) Jericho walls (1) Jesus & Gospels (1) Jesus' Deity (1) Jesus' tomb (1) Jesus' youth (1) John the Baptist (1) Joseph's scheme (1) Karma (1) Killing God (1) Mary promotions (1) Michael Brown (1) Musical chords (1) Nabeel Qureshi (1) Nikolas Cruz (1) OT Bible (1) Paul's conversion (1) Phi (1) Prophecies.. (1) Prophecies.Bk of Daniel (1) Quran (1) Richard Dawkins (1) Roman Empire (1) Satan (1) Sh'khinah (1) Son of God (1) Suicide (1) Ted Bunny (1) The Cross & guillotines (1) Tree of Knowledge (1) Trinity analogy (1) Wisemen (1) Y DNA (1) absurdity of life (1) acoustic resonance (1) animal migrations (1) apologetics (1) atheist Pro (1) chicken or eggs (1) comet (1) comparisons of religions (1) creation (1) dialogue with M (1) doubting Thomas, (1) earthquake (1) emperor's cloth (1) empty tomb (1) evil (1) executions (1) fabrication (1) falling down (1) fine tuning of universe (1) free will (1) goodness (1) hallucination (1) hell (1) history (1) human hibernation. suspended animation (1) justice (1) life is short (1) logic (1) meaning of life (1) movie (1) multiverse (1) nature's laws (1) objections fr Jews (1) original sin. Bible out of context (1) original sin. temptations (1) pains (1) philosophy. (1) philosophy. Big Bang (1) popes (1) porn addiction (1) probabilities (1) reality check (1) reincarnation (1) relationship (1) restoration (1) resurrection (1) sanke handler (1) science & God (1) self disclosure (1) short skit (1) sin (1) sins (1) snake (1) songs (1) stumbling blocks (1) the Star of Bethlehm (1) theology (1) unusual birth (1) who made God (1) why. love letters (1) wise men (1) 人類的起源, 進化論 (1)

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Can a multiverse disprove God ?


1. A multiverse would not disprove God

Before we start exploring what’s wrong with a multiverse, we notice that if scientists could confirm that there were multiple universes, this would not disprove the existence of a creator God. What it would do (or might do) is to take away one argument for God’s reality – the argument from fine-tuning. It would still leave open the question of whether there is a God.
This is why a scientist and theologian like David Wilkinson can be relaxed about the possibility of a multiverse:
‘I don’t worry about a God who creates many universes. The God who creates this universe with a hundred billion stars in each of a hundred billion galaxies is big enough for me to try to struggle with as a concept.  A few more billion galaxies wouldn’t be too worrying to me. It’s just a few noughts at the end of what is already a very long number.’

2. There is no evidence for a multiverse

The biggest single objection to the idea of multiple universes is that there is (at least, so far) no evidence for it. Richard Dawkins says that
‘Scientific belief is based on publicly checkable evidence.’[1]
But he also advances multiple universes as an explanation for cosmic fine tuning, without any supporting evidence.  This is self-contradictory.
As Rodney Holder says:
‘Curiously enough someone like Richard Dawkins says ‘no, I believe in a multiverse. That will explain [the fine tuning].’ On the other hand, Richard Dawkins tells you that you should only believe things on the basis of evidence. Well, there’s a massive contradiction there within the thought of Richard Dawkins.’...

3. A multiverse undermines scientific inquiry

The idea of a multiverse undermines all scientific inquiry: for example, imagine you see some highly improbable event (all the molecules of air in the room suddenly arrange themselves in one corner, leaving a vacuum everywhere else). Well, so what? We live in a multiverse. Even the most unlikely of events are bound to happen somewhere. The problem is that you can use a multiverse to explain away absolutely anything. This has the potential to put a stop to scientific inquiry.

4. Even a multiverse may not be able to account for fine tuning

We instinctively feel that if there are enough universes, anything is possible. This is a good example of our instincts letting us down:
Even if scientists did discover conclusive evidence for a multiverse, this would not necessarily be enough to account for the fine-tuning. As John Polkinghorne says:
Simply by having a large or indeed an infinite array of universes you couldn’t be sure that you’d get one that was right for life.  I mean, for example, there are an infinite number of even numbers, but never in that collection will you find a number with the property of oddness.  So it’s not clear that having an infinite collection means you’ve got everything you might want.
So an infinite number of universes may not be enough to solve the fine-tuning problem.

5. A multiverse may just push the problem up a level

If the existence of a multiverse could somehow be proved, this may just push the problem of fine-tuning up a level: we would still need to ask why the laws that govern the multiverse produce such a massive range of diversity as to guarantee that complicated life like ours is possible in at least one universe?

6. The Multiverse is a very extravagant idea...

         ( To finish reading this article and for further discussions please click the following links.)
Is a multiverse a better explanation than God for cosmic fine tuning?

Friday, January 10, 2014

HOW CRITICS FARE IN THE FIERY FURNACE

HOW CRITICS FARE IN THE FIERY FURNACE
Dr. W. A. Criswell
Daniel 3:19-27


In the third chapter in the Book of Daniel, as you know, they put the three Hebrew children, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah…(Meshach, Shadrach, Abednego)…they put them in the fiery furnace.  But they were children of the Lord.  They were faithful to God.  They believed in the marvelous presence of the holy Jehovah in life.  And God blessed them. 
Now, the critic and the modern rationalist, how will they fare in the white, burning heat of historical truth and spiritual fact?  As for Daniel in the Critic’s Den, they seem to have eaten him up alive.  Under four great categories does the rationalist and the liberal attack the Book of Daniel. 

They say, first, that it is filled with historical errors and inaccuracies, mis-guesses, misrepresentations, full of fiction and imagination.  Then second, they attack it, philologically.  They say it is full of linguistic language irreconcilables.  Then they attack it prophetically. They say it’s full of prophetic impossibilities.  Then they attack it doctrinally.  They say it’s full of doctrinal aberrations...
...First, it’s in the canon, it’s in the Bible, which meant those old and ancient rabbis believed that it was written before Nehemiah, and in the days of the sixth century BC. 
All right, second, it is in the Septuagint, LXX, seventy.  The Septuagint, the most famous and most influential of all of the translations in the world is the Greek Septuagint.  In Alexandria, in the days of the colonies, some Jewish scholars gathered together, that’s where it gets its name, Septuagint, seventy, there were supposed to be seventy of them, and they translated the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek.  And the Septuagint translation of the Holy Bible is the one that the apostles used when they preached the gospel of the Son of God. 
...Now the Septuagint was translated in Alexandria about 300 BC.  And many scholars say that by 275 BC, that the translation was complete.  Yet, these critics say that the Book of Daniel was written in 165 BC, when the Book of Daniel is in the Septuagint, which was supposed to have been translated 300 BC.
...1Maccabees, one of the noblest, one of the noblest pieces of literature in the world.  In the first chapter of 1 Maccabees the author quotes the Book of Daniel.  And this is the time when Daniel was supposed to be forged.  He quotes the Book of Daniel as being inspired Scripture. 

And, in the second chapter of the Book of Maccabees, old, venerable, dying Mattathias, the priest who moved in and challenged the Greeks under Antiochus Epiphanes who was trying to make the temple of Jerusalem a part of Jupiter’s temple and offered a pig, a sow, on the altar and spread its juice, took its juice and carried it all over the temple and spread it around to defile it all, old Mattathias, an aged venerable father, dying in the second chapter of the Book of Maccabees, calls his boys around him, and he addresses Judas Maccabaeus, from whence it gets its name the Maccabees, “the hammer”, he addresses his son, Judas Maccabaeus, and Simon and the rest of his brethren, and he urges them to be true to the faith.  And he cites, as an instance of loyalty unto God to death the three Hebrew boys named in the Book of Daniel.  He cites Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah and he tells the story of Daniel in the lion’s den.  That’s in 1 Maccabees, written about the time they say the forgery of Daniel was composed and pawned off. 
...When Alexander the Great approached with his great army to destroy the city, he was met with a glorious procession of Jaddua, the high priest and his fellow priests; and then all of the people of the city distressed in pure white.  And when Jaddua met Alexander the Great, he had in his hand a copy of the Word of God.  And Jaddua opened it at the Book of Daniel and showed Alexander the Great, out of the Book of Daniel, how Daniel had prophesied his coming and his great victories. 
...Then Josephus tells how Alexander the Great bowed and then went up to the temple and called on the name of Jehovah God and offered sacrifices in His name.  And when was that?  330 BC.  Yet the critic said the Book was written in 165 BC, as a forgery.  Just following the history of the Book of Daniel.  Of course, they say Josephus is a liar.  And that this is fiction, too.  But this fact remains that can’t be denied, Alexander the Great burned to the ground every city in Syria that was friendly to Darius, the king of the Persians.  But he spared Jerusalem and favored honored upon it.  Why?  There has to be some answer.  And the answer is found in Josephus and the story that Josephus told.
,,,Qumran, just a few years ago, they discovered the Dead Sea Scrolls in those caves at the north end of the Dead Sea.  And the oldest copies that we had of the old Bible were written about 900 AD; and they found there scrolls of the Bible that were written before Christ, which took back the Old Testament Scriptures more than a thousand years.  And in the Qumran Scrolls, they found Isaiah.  And in the Qumran Scrolls, they found Daniel.  And those scrolls date back in their writing and in their copies, you know, when they were copying, those scrolls date back to the time when they say the forgery of Daniel was composed.  There it is upon the Word of God. 
Allow me one other word by summary.  We have had thousands, and we have had thousands of years to see for ourselves whether or not the prophecies of Daniel are true.  We’re not shut up to what a critic says.  We have thousands and thousands of years to test whether or not the prophecies of Daniel are true or not.  Are they true?  Daniel said the head of gold is Babylon.  And the arms and the breast are Media and Persia; and the thigh is Greece, Alexander and his kingdom; and the legs of iron are Rome, east and west.  And thereafter, Daniel says, there’ll never be another world empire.  It is broken up into clay and iron in the toes of the image.  Is it true?  Or is it not?  We have had thousands of years to fix it.  Is it of God and only God could know the future?  Is it or is it not? ...( Please click the link below to read the whole article)

Who Made God?

My dear philosopher friend WJ:

As you have advised me again and again, not to seek science support for Bible. Dare I suggest that you not to bury your head in all the philosophical jungles that are far away from reality..( Sorry, for not able to come up with a better terminology, perhaps our friend
Dio can come to my rescue for a better expression. If "jungle" offends you, please excuse my stupidity which prevents me from catching up philosophically with you.)

However, I strongly believe that our Creator God is the One who created this universe and the same One who inspired the Bible writers from Moses to prophets to 4 gospel writers to Paul, Peter, John...etc Therefore what natural laws God put in nature will not contradict what He inspired Bible writers to put down in Bible. If we encounter superficial contradictions between science and Bible, it is because we misinterpret Bible or science hasn't advanced there yet. It shouldn't be too far away when some day science & Bible will converge.( of course, Bible is not a science text book! I am not that naive.) Without this strong conviction, I won't spread the Gospel to anyone at all. If Almighty God can't do any miracles, then He is not our Creator God at all. Please don't treat Bible miracles as fairy tales. Miracles don't happen everyday, but they do happen, God willing.

Here is a brief quote from Arno Penzias, worth your thinking. It is interesting that more and more liberal Bible scholars and modern philosophers have tried to discredit Bible, especially Genesis, many outstanding scientists have come out to prove that Bible is trustworthy. Perhaps it is about time that you give Bible a reality test; checking its validity and reliability, and not discard the traditional beliefs just because they are traditional.

"The best data we have concerning the big bang are exactly what I would have predicted, had I nothing to go on but the five books of Moses, the Psalms, the Bible as a whole." --Arno Penzias(astrophysicist and Nobel laureate) in The New York Times, 12 March 1978 

The link below will give more details about Arno Penzias, if you are interested.

Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson - Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ

(Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson

Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ


The Large Horn Antenna and the Discovery of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation )


I've enjoyed reading " Who Made God?" Searching for a theory of everything. Hope you may read it too.

...This beginning  of our universe can be modeled in various ways such as a ‘hot big bang’ singularity, but all such models point to an origin in which space, time, matter and energy came into being ex nihilo (out of nothing)  just as the biblical hypothesis of God predictsCurrent scientific cosmologies thus imply the existence of a non-physical realm (we’ll call it ‘eternity’) that transcends space and time and within which the physical universe was created. We shall discover that the hypothesis of God correctly predicts what science is only now beginning to reveal about this non-physical realm...


I hope above brief quote (from " Who made God?"  by Edgar Andrews) echoes Genesis 1, that God created our universe out of nothing.